• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

South Mountain Company

Martha’s Vineyard’s integrated design/build company

  • What we do
    • Process & Practice
    • Architecture & Engineering
    • Building
    • Interior Design
    • Solar & Energy Technology
  • Who we are
    • Our Team
    • The Company
    • Martha’s Vineyard
    • Beyond our Shores
    • Our History
    • Our Model
    • Careers
    • Internships
  • Portfolio
    • Residential
    • Non-Residential
    • Solar & Energy Technology
    • Affordable Housing
  • Media
    • Newsletter
    • Press Archive
    • Blog Archive
  • Contact
  • Search

Dear Reader,
This blog is now an archive. John Abrams (Founder of South Mountain, author of this blog, and a book of the same name) retired on December 31, 2022. All posts published up until this date are preserved below.

For updates on John's next chapter, visit abramsangell.com.

For updates on South Mountain's second act, subscribe to our newsletter using the form below.

Tower Down

By John Abrams | October 25, 2013

For several years our 100’ steel tower stood here without a wind turbine on top.  We took the machine down for repairs and never put it back up.  We decided to save it for parts, for the several other similar turbines we installed years ago in other locations.

Meanwhile, we have covered the roofs of our building here with enough solar panels to take care of all the energy needs for our shop and offices.  Having just switched our heating and cooling to all-electric air source heat pumps, we’re pretty much at Net Zero for the entire facility (we’ll find out for sure after a year of monitoring).

We’re not in the wind business any more (as important as we think it is), and our experiment had not been particularly successful, so it was time to take the tower down, pack it up, and prepare it for its next home.  Pete D’Angelo and Phil Forest orchestrated the project.

But before it came down, Phil, who was always responsible for servicing the machine, felt the need to experience the top of the tower one more time.

Here’s what Phil had to say, and what he saw, and what we saw:

“While I sat comfortably on top of the wind turbine tower, waiting for the crane to arrive, I took in the fall foliage of the oak forest and I saw water in Lake Tashmoo brought in from the last tide. I thought about the impermanent, ever- changing nature of things.

I felt small.

 . . . and part of it all.

It was a long way down.

When the crane arrived, I attached the straps from the tower to the crane’s hook, then climbed down.

We dismantled the tower thoughtfully, organizing and labeling the parts so it would be easy to reassemble for it’s next (still unknown) use. “

Well, there you have it.  The world according to Phil from the top of the former tower.

(Are you wondering why we’re not in the wind business anymore?  Well, we weren’t in it for long; it was just something nobody was doing in our area that we felt needed examination.  Soon after we got involved Gary Harcourt started Great Rock Windpower and they do a superb job.  Also, we decided we’re not the right company to get into Big Wind and we don’t think there’s much of a future for small, distributed, one-off Small Wind.  It’s too complex and too problematic.  Great Rock does small and big in our region.  When it comes to renewables, solar is definitely the arena for us!)

So  . . .  anybody looking for a used 100’ galvanized steel tower in excellent condition?  We know where you can find it.

Categories: Energy, Martha's Vineyard, South Mountain Company Tags: Air source heat pumps, Great Rock Windpower, Net Zero, Pete D'Angelo, Phil Forest, solar, South Mountain Company, Wind turbines

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Rodney North

    October 26, 2013 at 12:07 pm

    It’s interesting how much different has been your experience with “small solar” than it was with “small wind” power. As the average, but interested, lay person I would have guessed that they’d be equally attractive or equally problematic (w/the exception that I know neighbors seem to object to turbines but rarely? to solar). Was wind’s NIMBY factor, in fact, an important variable in why SMCo does so much more w/solar?

    Reply
  2. jabrams

    October 26, 2013 at 12:14 pm

    Rodney,

    NIMBY is a factor, but only one. Siting is difficult in several ways, because turbines need to be far from property lines, one does not want to inflict “blade flicker” on neighbors, and noise can sometimes be a problem. Getting permits is more difficult with wind than solar.

    In addition, small wind turbines are mechanically complex and high maintenance, whereas solar electric systems have no moving parts and generally work for decades with little or no maintenance. Large wind farms assume a “service factor” and generally expect that a percentage of the machines will be down at any given time and have full-time service crews. Single machines are either working or, sometimes, not working at all. It’s an all or nothing situation.

    John

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

sidebar

Footer

UPS/Fedex

15 Red Arrow Road
West Tisbury, MA 02575

USPS

Post Office Box 1260
West Tisbury, MA 02575

Call/Email

508.693.4850

info@southmountain.com

Subscribe

Follow Us

  • Instagram
  • Houzz
  • Pinterest